Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Chicago Tribune Vision Quest

New Chicago Tribune Editor Gerry Kern laid out his grand vision for the "reinvention" of the Chicago Tribune in an email and memo to staffers today. He basically thinks the Tribune should be more like an iPhone. Readers should love us and think we're cool!

He also includes this cryptic, Learyesque catchphrase: "The experience of the news is as important as the news itself." Maybe it's the smoke rolling out of Lee Abram's office. But I'm thinking Kern is saying that reading the paper while crapping on the john is the same thing as Russia invading Georgia.

Now that, my friends, is vision. You can catch Gerry talking about his salad days at Indiana University, should you want more bio. Via Romenesko.

Here's the email:
Colleagues:

What do you see in our newspaper's future?

Do you see a bleak time ahead of continued decline with more layoffs like those we endured last week? Or do you see brighter possibilities that can be achieved through hard work and resourcefulness? The way you answer these questions will determine your success and ours.

I see tremendous opportunities amid all the uncertainty. Everyone who remains at this great newspaper must now commit to the work required to realize them. Our success begins with the belief that it is possible.
The rest of the email and accompanying "Vision" memo follow the jump.
Like other news organizations, we are adapting to the new realities of the information marketplace. Audiences are fragmenting across an expanding array of digital media. Advertising dollars, already scarce because of a cyclical downturn, are following that shift.

We're now in transition to a new media environment. We don't know exactly what this will look like or how long it will take. We clearly are moving toward becoming a 24/7 online business that also publishes in print once a day.

While there are unknowns ahead, we are not powerless. There is much we can do to create the future we all want. We can become relentlessly entrepreneurial about expanding our audiences by ensuring that everything we do is rooted in meeting consumers' needs and desires.

Long before the rise of electronic media, dozens of newspapers circulated on the streets of major American cities, each competing on the strength of a story to strike a chord with readers. Success was easily measured: How many papers did we sell today? Today, web sites have replaced street hawkers clutching papers, and we can instantly measure response via clicks.

But let's be clear. The good old days weren't all that good. There were excesses, and often newspapers had few qualms about pandering to make a sale. Over the decades, journalism became a profession and embraced high ethical standards. Accuracy, fairness and courageous public service became the heart of our mission. They remain so today.

But a fundamental truth endures: Without an engaged audience that finds value in what we offer, we cannot succeed. Journalism is not an abstraction that exists apart from the audience. It must deliver what the audience needs and wants.

I have been listening to readers for years, in research studies, in focus groups and individually. They want us to investigate public issues, stand up for our communities, hold our government officials accountable, tell them the bad news they need to know and connect them to the larger world.

But readers want us to do a lot more. They want practical information and advice they can use in their daily lives. They want us to tell fascinating stories that they can share—and those don't always have to be the "important" stories of the day. They want us to entertain them, too.

People have many choices for news and information, and if we're not prepared to give them what they want, they can—and will—go elsewhere.

One of the most revealing insights from recent research is how little excitement some people feel about their daily encounter with us. Many of our regular readers regard us like the electric company or water utility. Yes, everyone wants electricity and water and it's a pain to do without them. But your soul just isn't stirred by the sight of working faucet or wall socket.

I realize that this perception is unfair and that it does not fully match reality. The Chicago Tribune routinely publishes groundbreaking investigations and is filled with compelling stories, columns and other features that deliver on our promise to readers. Your great work is evident in each edition. But perceptions count, too. We have work to do in changing them.

Think about the products that you love most. Maybe it's your iPhone. It's your personal portal to the universe of information and human interaction. It's your music library, video player and photo album, ready to respond to the moment and your mood. You love your iPhone because of the richness of the overall experience, not just its functionality.

That's emotional engagement.

And that's the keystone idea in the vision driving the Chicago Tribune's editorial reinvention. I've attached an outline of the vision and supporting principles that the newsroom redesign team has developed. We'll be sharing more with you shortly about the new Tribune, but first it is important to share the thinking behind it.

Here is the essence:

The experience of the news is as important as the news itself. We will strengthen our bond with readers by giving them the news, information and irresistible storytelling they desire in their lives. We will enlighten, provoke, surprise and entertain them. We want them to say, "This is my Tribune and I can't get along without it."

Readers will embrace us as their Tribune if they see themselves, their lives, their circumstances, their interests reflected on our pages. If they see that we provide solutions to their problems, we will become their indispensable survival guide to the complexities of life. If they find our personalities and experts stimulating, enlightening and entertaining, readers won't want to miss a single edition.

And we will succeed.

Gerry

Vision for reinventing the Chicago Tribune

Our goal:

Emotional engagement: The experience of the news is as important as the news itself. We will strengthen our bond with readers by giving them the news, information and irresistible storytelling they desire in their lives. We will enlighten, provoke, surprise and entertain them. We want them to say, “This is my Tribune and I can’t get along without it.”

Our Voice:

Smart, relevant, engaged, provocative, powerful, unpretentious, playful, passionate.

Who We Are:

We are in touch with our readers’ lives. We are here to serve them.

We are accurate and fair.

We are courageous and principled.

We are imaginative, surprising and curious.

We are competitive.

What We Do:

We capture, celebrate and convey the energy, vitality and drama of Chicago in the 21st Century—24 hours a day, online, in print and on radio and television.

We understand our readers and give them the information they need and want to lead their lives. Personal relevance and utility are essential elements of our reporting.

We tell compelling stories with powerful words and images that connect with our readers intellectually and emotionally.

We stand up for our citizens and communities, uncovering wrongdoing and holding our institutions, public servants, businesses and others accountable.

We deliver local news more quickly, accurately and completely than our competitors.

We illuminate the world for our readers and explain how it matters to them.

We entertain our readers and serve as a welcome diversion in their day.

We listen and talk to our readers and give them a voice on our pages.

We showcase the unique perspectives of our columnists, personalities and expert voices.

We constantly innovate, take smart risks and look forward.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

My reaction to the "vision" memo is like that of the Irishman Steven in Braveheart after Mel Gibson gives his "I AM William Wallace" performance.

"Fine speech," he said. "Now what do we do?"

Don't get me wrong. I've got my face painted blue and am as ready as the next man to hike up the front my kilt to taunt Longshanks, or Arianna Huffington, as the case may be.

But just saying we are "fearless, smart, sexy" (working from memory here), just saying those things isn't enough to reverse the years of conditioning to be timid, slow, parochial and insular.

The people are smart and fearless. The paper is not.

Nice speech, Gerould. Now what do we do?

Here's an idea. Ask each of your people for the last ten ideas that Gratteau, et al, allowed to grow moldy in holding because the editors lacked the balls to do anything different.

Then run the damn stories.

Anyway, Gratteau is gone. Let's see what kind of a team Gerould puts together.

Retch, mock Abrams if you want. But shit gets done around this guy. Yeah, he's got those long rants, but did you ever meet any of the vapid suits from previous regimes? Fucking gas bags. Soulless robots.

I'll take Abrams any day because he gets shit done. And if he can make, uh, help, Gerould get shit done, well rock on, motherfucker. Rock on.

Anonymous said...

Memo to Gerry: They are reading the paper. Psssst: they're doing it for free online, but don't tell anyone. So instead of fucking around with the product, why don't you fix the business model.

Anonymous said...

Seeing as how Kern just appointed Jane Hirt, the manager of the Tribune's newspaper for dumb 20-somethings, RedEye, to be the Tribune's new managing editor...

... I think it's pretty clear what his vision is. And it ain't pretty.

Anonymous said...

As usual, these guys are huge on generalities, light on specifics. I don't think many journalists necessarily disagree with Gerry (by the way you got the job already so lighten up) but how about a little more detail about what exactly you mean by `enlighten, provoke and entertain' readers. Don't we do that already? I often wonder if these editors really believe this stuff or if they are like the old Communist aparachniks (spelling?) spewing cant for the benefit of the Party and to keep their jobs.

Anonymous said...

Once again lofty platitudes without a strategic plan.
The only thing Tribune upper Mismanagement recognize is that there are a lot of unknowns.

That is understandable as today's media audience can pick and choose what they want. Media atomization was a phrase I used at Tribune some 5 years ago.

Problem is no one picked up on it.

Tribune missed the online golden opportunity in the 90s by not developing a presence, and it is far too late to play catchup. No Tribune news site is listed in Nielsen Online’s Top 30 Current Events & Global News Destinations, although Gannett, Cox, Hearst, Media General (and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) are. And I dont see a compelling reason for any net user to help Tribune crack that barrier.

Television news is not the golden egg either. The DTV transition in 6 months will begin the death slide of over-the-air TV; expect more layoffs and homogenization in broadcast, gang.

Anonymous said...

I read the Red Eye paper and I enjoy it.

I read the Tribune online and I enjoy it.

I stopped my dead tree subscription years ago.

It's not a question of how to bring the dead tree version back to life, but rather, how to make money off the "new media". Google is a search engine and has many free services. Zell paid about $8B for the Tribune (plus whatever debt was included - $13B?). Google has a market value of $150B. So "free" is not bad, there are other ways to generate revenue besides subscription fees. New media is the future.

Obviously content is key for the media business and investment must be made there. But you need to provide content that your consumer wants NOT what you think they need.

There is no one more that Zell who wants the Tribune to be successful. We need to work together as a team to make the Tribune sucessful (full disclosure: I am not a Tribune employee, I just thought that previous line sounded good).

I don't mean to be a jerk, but if all of these disgruntled employees think Zell is going in the wrong direction, there is nothing from stopping employees from leaving and starting there own venture, individually or as a group (and I assume some are and will). That is the beautiful thing about competition. Will it be easy? No. But if someone is not willing to take a risk, then don't expect any big reward or handout.

Good luck.

Anonymous said...

"But you need to provide content that your consumer wants NOT what you think they need."

Wrong. That's not journalism. It's entertainment.

Anonymous said...

We're reading it online. Stop trying to redesign the paper, selling shit like the Tower, and driving away people like Maury Possly and Jim Warren and figure out how to make money off the web.

Anonymous said...

"Wrong. That's not journalism. It's entertainment."

The statement above is the type of closed minded thinking that is causing traditional news organizations to lose subscribers and advertisers.

You know what? We readers are not idiots. We know how shift though information to determine news versus entertainment.

And what you make think is news may just be your opinion on an issue. That is not news, that is being preached to. You don't tell us what we need to hear, we tell you what you need to report. If you don't like that, feel free to start your own paper.

Good luck in your future endeavors. And you need to work on your anger issues.

Anonymous said...

[[anonymous said...We're reading it online. Stop trying to redesign the paper, selling shit like the Tower, and driving away people like Maury Possly and Jim Warren and figure out how to make money off the web.]]

Jim Warren said more in that damned fairwell email of his than I've heard him say in all the years he and I have been around the Trib. I think he always wanted DeLama's job and when he didn't get it, or the top job, he moped around the building, moped through meetings. I didn't get the sense that he was having any fun or that he knew how to relate to people. Maury Possley is a hell of a loss. There are many genuine reasons to pour a few frosty ounces on the ground and salute those who have left or were forced out. But Warren and all the other sages and monks who had constipated the system and frustrated journalists, they are not among those reasons. They're gone. Good riddance. Go be boring somewhere else.

To say "stop re-designing the paper" implies that in its current state the Trib has reached the apex of good design. A couple of hundred thousand people still buy the damn thing every day and those people could benefit from a smart re-design. All the boring AP crap that nobody reads, push that onto the web and open up space in the paper for original reporting.

I'm just saying.

Anonymous said...

"And what you make think is news may just be your opinion on an issue. That is not news, that is being preached to. You don't tell us what we need to hear, we tell you what you need to report. If you don't like that, feel free to start your own paper."

Still wrong. And still not journalism--sorry. Perhaps you'd be more comfortable with a subscription to "People."

Anonymous said...

So I'm a dumb 20 something who reads RedEye. Thank you so much for being so up front about your respect for me as a reader and my intelligence in general.

I welcome anyone who gets you out of a position of public influence.