<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post5754327724673863129..comments</id><updated>2008-08-18T16:53:50.574-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Tell Zell: Doing the Numbers</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.tellzell.com/feeds/5754327724673863129/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html'/><author><name>InkStainedRetch</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01440436560152599380</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>17</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-4010621251298476359</id><published>2008-08-18T16:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-18T16:45:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Anonymous said...The Weather Page Editor got laid...</title><content type='html'>"Anonymous said...&lt;BR/&gt;The Weather Page Editor got laid off? OH THE HUMANITY! WILL NEWSPAPERS SURVIVE?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Weather pages are exactly the kind of thing papers should have quit doing ten years ago. No. Twenty.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;At least someone is thinking ahead, and not just whining."&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You're assuming a lot there. I've never thought much of the post-USA Today weather page orgasm most papers undertook. Most of them blew a color page on them that could have been used for more important things. One paper I worked for in the '80s did a color weather page. Production included hand cutting rubylith on as many as a dozen sheets of acetate to construct the nationwide temperatures. What a waste, but for some reason, not having the weather in the paper pisses people off. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Of course, cutting features always pisses people off, but the Times brain trust did that this time around with abandon. It doesn't just mean cutting them from print, it means most of them aren't online either. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;That'll get readers to visit the site. *roll eyes*</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/4010621251298476359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/4010621251298476359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1219106700000#c4010621251298476359' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-1925547726127861371</id><published>2008-08-18T16:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-18T16:37:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Those well sourced old-timers did a really good j...</title><content type='html'>"Those well sourced old-timers did a really good job with the John Edwards scandal. Either they sat at their desks all day planning lunch or they purposely withheld the story. Either way, these "well sourced" employees should be fired.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Go Sam Go!!!!"&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Hey, dumbfuck, do you not understand that there are news executives, aka assistant managing editors and the managing editor who decided to sit on that story? NO? Well, I guess then we can chalk up your comment to the kind of ignorance now in charge at the Times. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Go back to watching Fox so your brilliant opinions can be reinforced by their "balanced reporting."</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1925547726127861371'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1925547726127861371'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1219106220000#c1925547726127861371' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-69930182639796865</id><published>2008-08-15T03:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-15T03:04:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Just because Tribune forces you to sign a waiver p...</title><content type='html'>Just because Tribune forces you to sign a waiver promising not to sue, does not automatically mean that waiver will hold up in court. (I've done a little research in this area.) If you feel your rights as a worker have been violated, under the federal Age Discrimination Act, you should talk about your particular circumstances with an attorney familiar with employee law in California.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/69930182639796865'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/69930182639796865'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218798240000#c69930182639796865' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-7080488483356823465</id><published>2008-08-13T22:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T22:27:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Oops, that's the other Times.</title><content type='html'>Oops, that's the &lt;I&gt;other&lt;/I&gt; Times.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/7080488483356823465'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/7080488483356823465'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218695220000#c7080488483356823465' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-3362781860359647471</id><published>2008-08-13T22:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T22:24:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Shirttail on Mark Spitz story: Frank Litsky has co...</title><content type='html'>Shirttail on Mark Spitz story: &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;I&gt;Frank Litsky has covered swimming for The Times for 50 years.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Better keep your head down, Frank.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3362781860359647471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3362781860359647471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218695040000#c3362781860359647471' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-469647919106167048</id><published>2008-08-13T19:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T19:24:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for doing this Retch. If you ask the averag...</title><content type='html'>Thanks for doing this Retch. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If you ask the average reader what a newspaper is comprised of, they'd say reporters, photographers, editors, copy editors, and recently designers. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I find it interesting that there are constant ads on job sites for the advertising department but none for the jobs named above.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As an intern at the Tribune company, I am extremely worried that there will be no way to further myself in this company. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I am by no means a yes-woman, and although not contrarian, I stand up for what I believe. That used to be an admiral quality. Nowadays editors seem to see it as pugilist.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I need some inspiration. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Desperately.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/469647919106167048'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/469647919106167048'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218684240000#c469647919106167048' title=''/><author><name>Intern</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-6649097175025598734</id><published>2008-08-13T08:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T08:19:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Thank you, Retch.  These numbers shed light on one...</title><content type='html'>Thank you, Retch.  These numbers shed light on one of the ugliest aspects of last month's bloodbath.  Many of us on the second and third floors can attest that most cuts were firings, hitting hardest at the most senior and seasoned (read oldest) Times newsroom staff.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;  I hope you and your correspondents will keep crunching the numbers and do research in your own departments.  Look hard at problem sections.  We all know how this came down.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Remember that if fired employees are to get their buyout money, they must sign waivers by the middle of September, promising not to sue.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Maybe, just maybe, you may strike enough fear in the hearts of the glass office dwellers that they will fight harder during the next round to save our jobs.  But don't count on it.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/6649097175025598734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/6649097175025598734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218644340000#c6649097175025598734' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-704339931030879227</id><published>2008-08-13T07:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T07:59:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>What struck me about the pie chart is this: if you...</title><content type='html'>What struck me about the pie chart is this: if you add up Editor, copy editor and designer categories, you get 40.9 percent of the layoffs coming from the pool of editors. Ouch.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/704339931030879227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/704339931030879227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218643140000#c704339931030879227' title=''/><author><name>brett</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18303899931045292330</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-3463492595712239276</id><published>2008-08-13T07:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T07:10:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Layoffs and Buyouts != Firing...Perhaps 'Involunta...</title><content type='html'>Layoffs and Buyouts != Firing...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Perhaps 'Involuntary Layoffs' would be more useful data to represent.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3463492595712239276'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3463492595712239276'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218640200000#c3463492595712239276' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-1342582938744956570</id><published>2008-08-13T07:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T07:06:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>... 21 percent of reporters over 50 were terminate...</title><content type='html'>... 21 percent of reporters over 50 were terminated (19 of 90)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In other words, you were five times more likely to be laid off if you were 55 than you were if you were 25 ...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;No, in other words, If you were 55+, you more likely to be able to -voluntarily- resign.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Bogus data interpretation.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1342582938744956570'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1342582938744956570'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218639960000#c1342582938744956570' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-4986082848518673995</id><published>2008-08-12T22:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T22:36:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>It's hard to draw any meaning from these numbers w...</title><content type='html'>It's hard to draw any meaning from these numbers without controlling for things like voluntary vs. involuntary -- there were volunteers among the missing, and we have no way of knowing how that skewed, age-wise. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Also, what about performance? Are we assuming older = more talented? Harder working? Does a more experienced worker &lt;I&gt;always&lt;/I&gt; carry more of the load than a younger one? I would argue that although those things might be true, they aren't a given. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Dangerous to establish a clear takeaway message when mining unclear data. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Something marginally related, to ponder: At many workplaces, 46 is not considered "young."</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/4986082848518673995'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/4986082848518673995'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218609360000#c4986082848518673995' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-6354447261743049277</id><published>2008-08-12T20:44:28.845-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T20:44:28.845-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The death of the 'gatekeeper' media cannot come so...</title><content type='html'>The death of the 'gatekeeper' media cannot come soon enough.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Bias = Layoffs</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/6354447261743049277'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/6354447261743049277'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218602668845#c6354447261743049277' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-8214086009404754716</id><published>2008-08-12T18:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T18:14:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Those well sourced old-timers did a really good jo...</title><content type='html'>Those well sourced old-timers did a really good job with the John Edwards scandal.  Either they sat at their desks all day planning lunch or they purposely withheld the story.  Either way, these "well sourced" employees should be fired.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Go Sam Go!!!!</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/8214086009404754716'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/8214086009404754716'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218593640000#c8214086009404754716' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-9059589187640270792</id><published>2008-08-12T17:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T17:41:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Retch:I'm finding pages 12-22 are blanked out and ...</title><content type='html'>Retch:&lt;BR/&gt;I'm finding pages 12-22 are blanked out and come up as solid red.  Do you need to upload again?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/9059589187640270792'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/9059589187640270792'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218591660000#c9059589187640270792' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-3278638524436506987</id><published>2008-08-12T16:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T16:23:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>You forgot the other half of the data in your pie ...</title><content type='html'>You forgot the other half of the data in your pie chart.  What percent of the Editorial staff was Reporter?  What percent were Admin?  And how many of the Level III Reporters who left did so voluntarily and how many were asked to go?  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This is meaningless data.  I hope your editors wouldn't let you get away with this pile of nothing.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3278638524436506987'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3278638524436506987'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218586980000#c3278638524436506987' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-3203643634825030371</id><published>2008-08-12T15:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T15:21:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Retch,With all due respect, I don't think you can ...</title><content type='html'>Retch,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;With all due respect, I don't think you can say reporters appear to be the hardest hit just because they represent the largest share of the people who were laid off. The LAT also employs many more reporters than copy editors, just to give an example. Likewise, designers may only represent 11.7% of the layoffs but way more than 11.7% of the design staff was laid off. I think it was actually closer to a third... Just sayin'. To really show which departments have been the hardest hit, you need to compare total before and after numbers for each department.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3203643634825030371'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/3203643634825030371'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218583260000#c3203643634825030371' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-1288489182930535332</id><published>2008-08-12T13:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T13:52:00.000-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Weather Page Editor got laid off? OH THE HUMAN...</title><content type='html'>The Weather Page Editor got laid off? OH THE HUMANITY! WILL NEWSPAPERS SURVIVE? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Weather pages are exactly the kind of thing papers should have quit doing ten years ago. No. Twenty. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;At least someone is thinking ahead, and not just whining.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1288489182930535332'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/5754327724673863129/comments/default/1288489182930535332'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html?showComment=1218577920000#c1288489182930535332' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.tellzell.com/2008/08/doing-numbers.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5498373244971935632.post-5754327724673863129' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5498373244971935632/posts/default/5754327724673863129' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>